<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (10) TMI 125 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84717</link>
    <description>A prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery arose where the duty demand was based on an estimated electricity-consumption norm for producing M.S. ingots, but no such production norms had been fixed under the relevant rule. Because the demand rested on an untested assumption rather than established evidence, interim relief was justified. The requirement to pre-deposit duty and penalty was dispensed with, and recovery was stayed pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:42:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121784" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (10) TMI 125 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84717</link>
      <description>A prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery arose where the duty demand was based on an estimated electricity-consumption norm for producing M.S. ingots, but no such production norms had been fixed under the relevant rule. Because the demand rested on an untested assumption rather than established evidence, interim relief was justified. The requirement to pre-deposit duty and penalty was dispensed with, and recovery was stayed pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>