<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (10) TMI 120 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84712</link>
    <description>A declaration filed in the prescribed proforma treated crucibles as an input component linked to the melting machinery for producing zinc dust, powder or flakes. Read as a whole, the declaration did not amount to deliberate suppression or misdeclaration, because the form itself omitted a separate column for machinery components and the description was consistent with the stated final product. The demand was also raised beyond six months, so the limitation objection could not be defeated by alleging departmental ignorance of the meaning of crucibles. On these facts, no referable question of law or mixed question of law and fact arose, and the reference application was rejected as not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:32:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121779" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (10) TMI 120 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84712</link>
      <description>A declaration filed in the prescribed proforma treated crucibles as an input component linked to the melting machinery for producing zinc dust, powder or flakes. Read as a whole, the declaration did not amount to deliberate suppression or misdeclaration, because the form itself omitted a separate column for machinery components and the description was consistent with the stated final product. The demand was also raised beyond six months, so the limitation objection could not be defeated by alleging departmental ignorance of the meaning of crucibles. On these facts, no referable question of law or mixed question of law and fact arose, and the reference application was rejected as not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84712</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>