<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (9) TMI 172 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84711</link>
    <description>Imported brass keys, brass locks and copper scrap found in a consignment could not be treated as &quot;mixed Brass Scrap Honey&quot; because the goods exceeded the permitted foreign material and did not answer the tariff description of metal waste or scrap not usable as such under the relevant customs note. The confiscation and duty-related classification objection were therefore maintained. However, as the record showed no mala fides and no knowledge of the mix-up on the importer&#039;s part, the original redemption fine was found excessive and reduced to a token amount. The substantive adverse findings remained undisturbed, with relief confined to moderation of the fine.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:25:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (9) TMI 172 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84711</link>
      <description>Imported brass keys, brass locks and copper scrap found in a consignment could not be treated as &quot;mixed Brass Scrap Honey&quot; because the goods exceeded the permitted foreign material and did not answer the tariff description of metal waste or scrap not usable as such under the relevant customs note. The confiscation and duty-related classification objection were therefore maintained. However, as the record showed no mala fides and no knowledge of the mix-up on the importer&#039;s part, the original redemption fine was found excessive and reduced to a token amount. The substantive adverse findings remained undisturbed, with relief confined to moderation of the fine.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84711</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>