https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84696 The tribunal upheld the Revenue's approach to calculating indirect costs based on actual production figures rather than normal production capacity in a dispute over the valuation of Sulphuric Acid. Additionally, the tribunal affirmed the Collector's decision to allow abatement for steam used in specific processes post-Sulphuric Acid production, rejecting the Revenue's appeal. Both appeals related to the valuation of Sulphuric Acid and the deduction of steam costs were dismissed in favor of the Revenue and the Collector's decisions. en-us Fri, 01 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:58:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84696 The tribunal upheld the Revenue's approach to calculating indirect costs based on actual production figures rather than normal production capacity in a dispute over the valuation of Sulphuric Acid. Additionally, the tribunal affirmed the Collector's decision to allow abatement for steam used in specific processes post-Sulphuric Acid production, rejecting the Revenue's appeal. Both appeals related to the valuation of Sulphuric Acid and the deduction of steam costs were dismissed in favor of the Revenue and the Collector's decisions. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 01 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84696