<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (12) TMI 121 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84686</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the cost of special packing (7-Ply double-faced corrugated boxes) should not be included in the assessable value of &quot;Lacto Calamine Lotion&quot; for excise duty purposes. Additionally, the demand raised by the Revenue was deemed time-barred as there was no willful suppression of facts with intent to evade duty. The majority decision set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeals with consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:16:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (12) TMI 121 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84686</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the cost of special packing (7-Ply double-faced corrugated boxes) should not be included in the assessable value of &quot;Lacto Calamine Lotion&quot; for excise duty purposes. Additionally, the demand raised by the Revenue was deemed time-barred as there was no willful suppression of facts with intent to evade duty. The majority decision set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeals with consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84686</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>