<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (12) TMI 115 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84680</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector of Customs&#039; decision on misdeclaration, classification, and assessment of duty on imported goods, while modifying the redemption fine and penalty under the Customs Act. The jurisdiction of DRI officers in seizing goods was deemed valid. The appeal by the importer was partly allowed with adjustments to fines and penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 15:15:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (12) TMI 115 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84680</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector of Customs&#039; decision on misdeclaration, classification, and assessment of duty on imported goods, while modifying the redemption fine and penalty under the Customs Act. The jurisdiction of DRI officers in seizing goods was deemed valid. The appeal by the importer was partly allowed with adjustments to fines and penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84680</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>