<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (12) TMI 107 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84672</link>
    <description>CEGAT, New Delhi affirmed the duty demand only for the 81 moped tyres found short on physical verification, holding that shortage was not disputed and demand for that quantity is sustainable. The tribunal set aside the remainder of the impugned order because the department relied solely on a private diary without corroborative evidence of clandestine production or removal; expert report doubts were not overcome and mere suspicion cannot substitute proof. Appeal partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2025 14:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (12) TMI 107 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84672</link>
      <description>CEGAT, New Delhi affirmed the duty demand only for the 81 moped tyres found short on physical verification, holding that shortage was not disputed and demand for that quantity is sustainable. The tribunal set aside the remainder of the impugned order because the department relied solely on a private diary without corroborative evidence of clandestine production or removal; expert report doubts were not overcome and mere suspicion cannot substitute proof. Appeal partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>