<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (11) TMI 138 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84585</link>
    <description>Goods whose principal and admitted function was reception of radio broadcasting were treated as radio sets within the exemption notification, even though they also had sound recording and reproducing facilities. Applying common parlance and trade parlance, the additional auxiliary function did not alter the essential character of the goods or take them outside the words used in the notification. The exemption was construed strictly, but not so narrowly as to deny benefit where the goods still answered the description &quot;Radio sets including transistor sets.&quot; The goods therefore qualified for the concessional rate of duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 18:33:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (11) TMI 138 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84585</link>
      <description>Goods whose principal and admitted function was reception of radio broadcasting were treated as radio sets within the exemption notification, even though they also had sound recording and reproducing facilities. Applying common parlance and trade parlance, the additional auxiliary function did not alter the essential character of the goods or take them outside the words used in the notification. The exemption was construed strictly, but not so narrowly as to deny benefit where the goods still answered the description &quot;Radio sets including transistor sets.&quot; The goods therefore qualified for the concessional rate of duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>