<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (10) TMI 106 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84570</link>
    <description>Captively consumed intermediate goods without a market may be valued under the Central Excise Valuation Rules by a reasonable and non-arbitrary method based on cost of production plus profit. The assessing authority may consider the profit margin of the final product as a relevant indicator, but not by mechanically applying it where the intermediate and final products differ in nature and quality. Comparable products and suitable adjustments may also be taken into account. The appellate authority was found to have erred in excluding the final product&#039;s profit margin altogether, and the valuation adopted by the assessing authority was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 17:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (10) TMI 106 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84570</link>
      <description>Captively consumed intermediate goods without a market may be valued under the Central Excise Valuation Rules by a reasonable and non-arbitrary method based on cost of production plus profit. The assessing authority may consider the profit margin of the final product as a relevant indicator, but not by mechanically applying it where the intermediate and final products differ in nature and quality. Comparable products and suitable adjustments may also be taken into account. The appellate authority was found to have erred in excluding the final product&#039;s profit margin altogether, and the valuation adopted by the assessing authority was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>