<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (10) TMI 101 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84565</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that additional charges for transport, handling, and local taxes are not includible in the assessable value under Section 4 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The appeals by the assessee were allowed, and the appeals by the Revenue were rejected. The Tribunal found no suppression or misstatement, rendering the limitation issue moot. The demand was deemed unjustified, leading to the rejection of the Department&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 17:34:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121709" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (10) TMI 101 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84565</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that additional charges for transport, handling, and local taxes are not includible in the assessable value under Section 4 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The appeals by the assessee were allowed, and the appeals by the Revenue were rejected. The Tribunal found no suppression or misstatement, rendering the limitation issue moot. The demand was deemed unjustified, leading to the rejection of the Department&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>