<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (10) TMI 99 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84563</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector&#039;s findings on undervaluation and misdeclaration of the imported goods. The evidence supported the conclusion that the appellants undervalued the goods, leading to confiscation and imposition of a redemption fine of Rs. 5 lakhs. The penalty was reduced to Rs. 1 lakh each due to deliberate misdeclaration. The appeal was rejected, with the penalty reduction being the only modification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 17:29:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121707" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (10) TMI 99 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84563</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector&#039;s findings on undervaluation and misdeclaration of the imported goods. The evidence supported the conclusion that the appellants undervalued the goods, leading to confiscation and imposition of a redemption fine of Rs. 5 lakhs. The penalty was reduced to Rs. 1 lakh each due to deliberate misdeclaration. The appeal was rejected, with the penalty reduction being the only modification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84563</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>