https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84545 Pre-deposit was waived and recovery stayed where the product classification was disputed across Collectorates, creating a prima facie case on the merits. The note records that if the input were treated as bars, the declaration under Rule 57G of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 would already cover it; if treated as flats, the resulting tubes would still fall within Notification No. 202/88-C.E. The revenue was therefore not exposed to jeopardy, and the applicants' financial difficulty also supported interim relief pending disposal of the appeal. en-us Thu, 14 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:51:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84545 Pre-deposit was waived and recovery stayed where the product classification was disputed across Collectorates, creating a prima facie case on the merits. The note records that if the input were treated as bars, the declaration under Rule 57G of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 would already cover it; if treated as flats, the resulting tubes would still fall within Notification No. 202/88-C.E. The revenue was therefore not exposed to jeopardy, and the applicants' financial difficulty also supported interim relief pending disposal of the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 14 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84545