<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (9) TMI 151 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84538</link>
    <description>Personal penalty under the Customs Act was held unsustainable because the department failed to establish a reliable nexus between the recovered chit and the appellant. The record showed no credible link between the name in the chit and the appellant&#039;s identity, and the alleged seizure was not supported by a proper mahazar or satisfactory proof of where and by whom the chit was recovered. In the absence of compliance with the statutory search-and-seizure procedure and without reliable evidence connecting the appellant to the seized material, the foundation for penalty was not made out, and the penalty was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:38:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (9) TMI 151 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84538</link>
      <description>Personal penalty under the Customs Act was held unsustainable because the department failed to establish a reliable nexus between the recovered chit and the appellant. The record showed no credible link between the name in the chit and the appellant&#039;s identity, and the alleged seizure was not supported by a proper mahazar or satisfactory proof of where and by whom the chit was recovered. In the absence of compliance with the statutory search-and-seizure procedure and without reliable evidence connecting the appellant to the seized material, the foundation for penalty was not made out, and the penalty was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84538</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>