<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (8) TMI 139 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84528</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s determination of the assessable value, confiscation, and penalty under the Customs Act, 1962. The plea for re-export was rejected, and the fine in lieu of confiscation and penalty were reduced from Rs. 5 lakh to Rs. 3 lakh and from Rs. 1 lakh to Rs. 50,000, respectively, taking into account the time since import and the characteristics of the goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 14:52:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121672" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (8) TMI 139 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84528</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s determination of the assessable value, confiscation, and penalty under the Customs Act, 1962. The plea for re-export was rejected, and the fine in lieu of confiscation and penalty were reduced from Rs. 5 lakh to Rs. 3 lakh and from Rs. 1 lakh to Rs. 50,000, respectively, taking into account the time since import and the characteristics of the goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>