https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84525 The Tribunal held that the reference application was not maintainable against an interlocutory order under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, due to the absence of a final order under Section 129B. The appellant's failure to comply with the duty deposit directive led to the application's inadmissibility. Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the appeal subject to dismissal under Section 129E, emphasizing the repercussions of non-compliance with stay orders. The appellant was granted a final opportunity to fulfill the deposit requirement, failing which the appeal would be dismissed without further notice, highlighting the significance of adhering to tribunal orders. en-us Thu, 24 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Jul 2011 14:48:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84525 The Tribunal held that the reference application was not maintainable against an interlocutory order under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, due to the absence of a final order under Section 129B. The appellant's failure to comply with the duty deposit directive led to the application's inadmissibility. Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the appeal subject to dismissal under Section 129E, emphasizing the repercussions of non-compliance with stay orders. The appellant was granted a final opportunity to fulfill the deposit requirement, failing which the appeal would be dismissed without further notice, highlighting the significance of adhering to tribunal orders. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 24 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84525