<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (8) TMI 131 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84520</link>
    <description>The second proviso to Notification No. 177/86-C.E. was clarified as inapplicable to scrap obtained from breaking up imported ships in India, and applicable only to scrap generated from breaking up Indian ships. Where duty-paying documents showed that the scrap came from imported ships, Modvat credit remained available on the duty-paid scrap. The earlier final order had omitted this material clarification, so rectification was warranted to reflect the correct position and permit credit in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 14:42:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (8) TMI 131 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84520</link>
      <description>The second proviso to Notification No. 177/86-C.E. was clarified as inapplicable to scrap obtained from breaking up imported ships in India, and applicable only to scrap generated from breaking up Indian ships. Where duty-paying documents showed that the scrap came from imported ships, Modvat credit remained available on the duty-paid scrap. The earlier final order had omitted this material clarification, so rectification was warranted to reflect the correct position and permit credit in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>