<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (7) TMI 194 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84510</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming that the show cause notice (SCN) was issued within the time limit, the refund had not acquired finality, and the amended provisions of Section 11B applied. The Assistant Collector&#039;s order for recovery and credit to the Consumer Welfare Fund was upheld, following the Supreme Court&#039;s approach in a relevant case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 13:30:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (7) TMI 194 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84510</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming that the show cause notice (SCN) was issued within the time limit, the refund had not acquired finality, and the amended provisions of Section 11B applied. The Assistant Collector&#039;s order for recovery and credit to the Consumer Welfare Fund was upheld, following the Supreme Court&#039;s approach in a relevant case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84510</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>