<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (9) TMI 133 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84452</link>
    <description>A bona fide declaration based on supplier documents did not preclude a finding of misdeclaration where examination showed that only part of the consignment matched the declared description. However, confiscation was unsustainable because the record did not establish concealment or the requisite culpability for penal consequences. On that basis, the penalty was also set aside. The redemption fine was reduced in view of the limited basis for interference and the surrounding circumstances of the declaration and examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:52:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (9) TMI 133 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84452</link>
      <description>A bona fide declaration based on supplier documents did not preclude a finding of misdeclaration where examination showed that only part of the consignment matched the declared description. However, confiscation was unsustainable because the record did not establish concealment or the requisite culpability for penal consequences. On that basis, the penalty was also set aside. The redemption fine was reduced in view of the limited basis for interference and the surrounding circumstances of the declaration and examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>