<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (7) TMI 181 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84434</link>
    <description>The court declined to interfere with the Excise authority&#039;s decision to levy Central Excise duty on wooden railway sleepers and sawn sizes, despite conflicting opinions from two coordinate Benches. The matter was referred to a Larger Bench for resolution to address the disagreement regarding the applicability of excise duty to goods produced through specific processes like sawing, emphasizing the need for clarity and consistency in judicial decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 18:43:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (7) TMI 181 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84434</link>
      <description>The court declined to interfere with the Excise authority&#039;s decision to levy Central Excise duty on wooden railway sleepers and sawn sizes, despite conflicting opinions from two coordinate Benches. The matter was referred to a Larger Bench for resolution to address the disagreement regarding the applicability of excise duty to goods produced through specific processes like sawing, emphasizing the need for clarity and consistency in judicial decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>