<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (7) TMI 178 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84426</link>
    <description>MODVAT credit under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 is confined to inputs used in or in relation to manufacture, and the process must bring into existence a new and distinct commodity with a different name, character or use. Reprocessing duty-paid nylon chips into plain or coloured chips without such transformation was treated as not amounting to manufacture, so credit was not admissible on that activity. By contrast, conversion of plain or coloured chips into compounded chips raised a factual question on whether a distinct product emerged, and the matter was remanded for de novo consideration with the assessee bearing the burden of proving manufacture.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 18:25:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (7) TMI 178 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84426</link>
      <description>MODVAT credit under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 is confined to inputs used in or in relation to manufacture, and the process must bring into existence a new and distinct commodity with a different name, character or use. Reprocessing duty-paid nylon chips into plain or coloured chips without such transformation was treated as not amounting to manufacture, so credit was not admissible on that activity. By contrast, conversion of plain or coloured chips into compounded chips raised a factual question on whether a distinct product emerged, and the matter was remanded for de novo consideration with the assessee bearing the burden of proving manufacture.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>