https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84414 Prima facie eligibility for exemption under Notification No. 175/86 was accepted despite use of a foreign brand name, because the Tribunal noted conflicting views on whether such use disqualifies the assessee only when the brand owner is in India. On that prima facie basis, and in light of divergent Tribunal decisions, pre-deposit of duty and penalty was waived and recovery of the disputed amounts was stayed pending appeal. en-us Fri, 09 Jun 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Jul 2011 17:58:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84414 Prima facie eligibility for exemption under Notification No. 175/86 was accepted despite use of a foreign brand name, because the Tribunal noted conflicting views on whether such use disqualifies the assessee only when the brand owner is in India. On that prima facie basis, and in light of divergent Tribunal decisions, pre-deposit of duty and penalty was waived and recovery of the disputed amounts was stayed pending appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 09 Jun 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84414