<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (4) TMI 178 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84398</link>
    <description>Modvat credit under the then applicable scheme was confined to payment of duty on a declared final product under the filed declaration. Credit used for bare copper wire was not available for enamelled copper wire, since a general statement in the classification list could not replace the specific declaration required by the rules. The duty demand on utilisation of credit for the undeclared product was sustained. However, once such credit was disallowed and duty was required to be paid from the PLA or in cash, the wrongly utilised credit had to be restored to the RG 23A Part II account. Restoration could be denied only where the final product was wholly exempt or nil-rated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 16:48:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121542" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (4) TMI 178 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84398</link>
      <description>Modvat credit under the then applicable scheme was confined to payment of duty on a declared final product under the filed declaration. Credit used for bare copper wire was not available for enamelled copper wire, since a general statement in the classification list could not replace the specific declaration required by the rules. The duty demand on utilisation of credit for the undeclared product was sustained. However, once such credit was disallowed and duty was required to be paid from the PLA or in cash, the wrongly utilised credit had to be restored to the RG 23A Part II account. Restoration could be denied only where the final product was wholly exempt or nil-rated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84398</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>