https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84397 Compliance with a conditional stay order requiring pre-deposit and furnishing of a bank guarantee under the Customs Act was treated as mandatory. Although the appellants deposited the cash amount, they failed to furnish the bank guarantee within the stipulated time and did not seek extension or modification before expiry of the period fixed by the Tribunal. That non-compliance with the Tribunal's order attracted dismissal of the appeals for failure to satisfy the statutory pre-deposit condition. en-us Fri, 07 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Jul 2011 16:46:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84397 Compliance with a conditional stay order requiring pre-deposit and furnishing of a bank guarantee under the Customs Act was treated as mandatory. Although the appellants deposited the cash amount, they failed to furnish the bank guarantee within the stipulated time and did not seek extension or modification before expiry of the period fixed by the Tribunal. That non-compliance with the Tribunal's order attracted dismissal of the appeals for failure to satisfy the statutory pre-deposit condition. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 07 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84397