<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 227 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84376</link>
    <description>Exemption for brass rods made on job-work basis was treated as unavailable to the extent the relevant raw materials were not proved duty-paid, but the absence of words such as &quot;alone&quot;, &quot;exclusively&quot; or &quot;wholly&quot; meant the use of some other materials did not by itself defeat the notification. Duty was therefore to be recomputed only on the quantity of finished goods attributable to non-duty-paid inputs, with fresh quantification and hearing on remand. Penalties on the manufacturers were reduced in line with the limited duty exposure, while penalties on the raw-material suppliers were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:55:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 227 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84376</link>
      <description>Exemption for brass rods made on job-work basis was treated as unavailable to the extent the relevant raw materials were not proved duty-paid, but the absence of words such as &quot;alone&quot;, &quot;exclusively&quot; or &quot;wholly&quot; meant the use of some other materials did not by itself defeat the notification. Duty was therefore to be recomputed only on the quantity of finished goods attributable to non-duty-paid inputs, with fresh quantification and hearing on remand. Penalties on the manufacturers were reduced in line with the limited duty exposure, while penalties on the raw-material suppliers were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84376</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>