<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 226 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84375</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the cost of the capsule, as part of the KOT container, is eligible for exclusion from the value of the biscuits under Notification No. 34/83-C.E. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a liberal interpretation of exemption provisions and concluded that the capsule&#039;s cost should not be included in the assessable value of the biscuits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:48:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121519" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 226 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84375</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the cost of the capsule, as part of the KOT container, is eligible for exclusion from the value of the biscuits under Notification No. 34/83-C.E. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a liberal interpretation of exemption provisions and concluded that the capsule&#039;s cost should not be included in the assessable value of the biscuits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>