<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (2) TMI 220 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84344</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the case for the Assistant Collector to consider the refund claim based on the documents provided by the appellants. The decision emphasized that when goods are lost before clearance for home consumption, remission under Section 23(1) is applicable, and further expenses need not be incurred to establish loss.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:01:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (2) TMI 220 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84344</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the case for the Assistant Collector to consider the refund claim based on the documents provided by the appellants. The decision emphasized that when goods are lost before clearance for home consumption, remission under Section 23(1) is applicable, and further expenses need not be incurred to establish loss.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>