<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (7) TMI 167 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84330</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant on various grounds, including the time-barred nature of the demand for recovery of differential duty, the lack of basis for provisional assessment based on High Court orders, incorrect calculation of Additional Duty, the distinction between High Court jurisdiction and Customs Act provisions, and the interpretation of relevant Customs Act sections. The decision granted consequential relief to the appellant based on the analysis and findings presented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:36:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (7) TMI 167 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84330</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant on various grounds, including the time-barred nature of the demand for recovery of differential duty, the lack of basis for provisional assessment based on High Court orders, incorrect calculation of Additional Duty, the distinction between High Court jurisdiction and Customs Act provisions, and the interpretation of relevant Customs Act sections. The decision granted consequential relief to the appellant based on the analysis and findings presented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84330</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>