<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (7) TMI 162 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84325</link>
    <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal by the department, allowing it to be linked with an existing appeal filed by the respondents for joint hearing. The majority emphasized the need for a pragmatic approach to condonation of delay to advance substantial justice, citing relevant case law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:26:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (7) TMI 162 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84325</link>
      <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal by the department, allowing it to be linked with an existing appeal filed by the respondents for joint hearing. The majority emphasized the need for a pragmatic approach to condonation of delay to advance substantial justice, citing relevant case law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84325</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>