<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (6) TMI 104 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84306</link>
    <description>The stay direction requiring pre-deposit of penalty was modified because the subsequent legal position on the importability of woollen or synthetic rugs and the relevant import conditions was entirely in favour of the applicants. In that setting, continued insistence on further pre-deposit was not justified as a condition for maintaining stay. The stay petition was therefore allowed unconditionally.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 11:27:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (6) TMI 104 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84306</link>
      <description>The stay direction requiring pre-deposit of penalty was modified because the subsequent legal position on the importability of woollen or synthetic rugs and the relevant import conditions was entirely in favour of the applicants. In that setting, continued insistence on further pre-deposit was not justified as a condition for maintaining stay. The stay petition was therefore allowed unconditionally.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>