<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 225 - GUJARAT  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84270</link>
    <description>Fiscal classifications in exemption notifications are valid where they rest on an intelligible differentia and have a rational nexus with the statutory object; the challenged width, weight and category criteria were not shown to be arbitrary or an unreasonable restriction on trade. Rule 9A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was held consistent with the excise scheme because it fixes duty by reference to the date of removal, so goods manufactured earlier but removed after revised notifications were chargeable at the then-prevailing rate. The Central Government was also held competent to vary the exemption structure within the statutory ceiling, and the notifications were intra vires.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:56:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 225 - GUJARAT  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84270</link>
      <description>Fiscal classifications in exemption notifications are valid where they rest on an intelligible differentia and have a rational nexus with the statutory object; the challenged width, weight and category criteria were not shown to be arbitrary or an unreasonable restriction on trade. Rule 9A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was held consistent with the excise scheme because it fixes duty by reference to the date of removal, so goods manufactured earlier but removed after revised notifications were chargeable at the then-prevailing rate. The Central Government was also held competent to vary the exemption structure within the statutory ceiling, and the notifications were intra vires.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>