https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84269 A scientific report from the Central Forensic Science Laboratory was treated as admissible under Section 293 CrPC, and an objection to its admissibility or mode of proof raised only at the appellate stage was not entertained where the report had been received without earlier challenge. The commentary also notes that conscious possession of poppy husk under the NDPS Act may be established through credible oral and documentary evidence, including trustworthy search and seizure witnesses, and compliance with the search safeguard by offering the accused the option of being searched before a Gazetted Officer or Metropolitan Magistrate under Section 50. On that reasoning, the scientific evidence and seizure were relied upon to sustain conviction. en-us Tue, 14 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:54:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84269 A scientific report from the Central Forensic Science Laboratory was treated as admissible under Section 293 CrPC, and an objection to its admissibility or mode of proof raised only at the appellate stage was not entertained where the report had been received without earlier challenge. The commentary also notes that conscious possession of poppy husk under the NDPS Act may be established through credible oral and documentary evidence, including trustworthy search and seizure witnesses, and compliance with the search safeguard by offering the accused the option of being searched before a Gazetted Officer or Metropolitan Magistrate under Section 50. On that reasoning, the scientific evidence and seizure were relied upon to sustain conviction. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 14 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84269