<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (3) TMI 241 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84253</link>
    <description>Dismissal of an appeal for non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement was improper where no notice had been issued proposing such dismissal. The matter was required to be reconsidered after giving the appellants an opportunity of hearing, and the impugned order was set aside. The appeal was remanded to the lower appellate authority for de novo adjudication in accordance with law, with liberty to file a fresh stay application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:55:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (3) TMI 241 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84253</link>
      <description>Dismissal of an appeal for non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement was improper where no notice had been issued proposing such dismissal. The matter was required to be reconsidered after giving the appellants an opportunity of hearing, and the impugned order was set aside. The appeal was remanded to the lower appellate authority for de novo adjudication in accordance with law, with liberty to file a fresh stay application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84253</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>