<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 219 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84248</link>
    <description>Imported excavator components were claimed as eligible for concessional customs duty under two exemption notifications, but the supporting certificates and documents had not been filed before the original authority. Because those materials were produced for the first time before the appellate tribunal and had not been examined below, the proper course was remand for de novo consideration rather than final determination of entitlement. The jurisdictional Assistant Collector was directed to reconsider the exemption claim after examining the documents and hearing the appellants, leaving the substantive benefit open on fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:39:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 219 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84248</link>
      <description>Imported excavator components were claimed as eligible for concessional customs duty under two exemption notifications, but the supporting certificates and documents had not been filed before the original authority. Because those materials were produced for the first time before the appellate tribunal and had not been examined below, the proper course was remand for de novo consideration rather than final determination of entitlement. The jurisdictional Assistant Collector was directed to reconsider the exemption claim after examining the documents and hearing the appellants, leaving the substantive benefit open on fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>