<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 214 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84233</link>
    <description>A delay of about two months in filing an appeal may be condoned where the explanation discloses sufficient cause and no deliberate negligence; here, the appellant&#039;s medical treatment and bed rest were accepted as a reasonable explanation, so the time-bar dismissal could not stand. The order dismissing the appeal as barred by limitation was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the first appellate authority for decision on merits in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:42:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 214 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84233</link>
      <description>A delay of about two months in filing an appeal may be condoned where the explanation discloses sufficient cause and no deliberate negligence; here, the appellant&#039;s medical treatment and bed rest were accepted as a reasonable explanation, so the time-bar dismissal could not stand. The order dismissing the appeal as barred by limitation was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the first appellate authority for decision on merits in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84233</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>