<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (5) TMI 121 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84207</link>
    <description>The High Court reversed the Single Judge&#039;s decision and allowed the appeal by the Union of India regarding the legality and validity of the show cause notice issued under Section 124 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Court held that the notice was valid as it provided sufficient grounds for Customs Officers to reasonably believe that the goods were being smuggled. The Court also affirmed the jurisdiction of Customs Officers to issue the notice based on admissions made by individuals involved. The petitioners&#039; actions were deemed an attempt to commit an offense, distinct from mere preparation, and the Court found the cited Supreme Court decisions inapplicable due to differing factual and legal contexts. The Customs Officers were directed to proceed with adjudication based on the notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 13:20:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121351" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (5) TMI 121 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84207</link>
      <description>The High Court reversed the Single Judge&#039;s decision and allowed the appeal by the Union of India regarding the legality and validity of the show cause notice issued under Section 124 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Court held that the notice was valid as it provided sufficient grounds for Customs Officers to reasonably believe that the goods were being smuggled. The Court also affirmed the jurisdiction of Customs Officers to issue the notice based on admissions made by individuals involved. The petitioners&#039; actions were deemed an attempt to commit an offense, distinct from mere preparation, and the Court found the cited Supreme Court decisions inapplicable due to differing factual and legal contexts. The Customs Officers were directed to proceed with adjudication based on the notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84207</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>