<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (5) TMI 116 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84202</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Additional Collector&#039;s order concerning the eligibility of an imported Automatic Wire Cutting and Stripping machine for clearance under OGL and benefit under Notification No. 118/80-Cus. The Tribunal determined that the machine, primarily designed for cutting and stripping wires with an additional twisting capability, was indeed eligible for the claimed benefits based on the manufacturer&#039;s description, past judgments, and confirmation from the Department of Electronics. Consequently, the impugned order was overturned, and the appellants were granted relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 13:12:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121346" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (5) TMI 116 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84202</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Additional Collector&#039;s order concerning the eligibility of an imported Automatic Wire Cutting and Stripping machine for clearance under OGL and benefit under Notification No. 118/80-Cus. The Tribunal determined that the machine, primarily designed for cutting and stripping wires with an additional twisting capability, was indeed eligible for the claimed benefits based on the manufacturer&#039;s description, past judgments, and confirmation from the Department of Electronics. Consequently, the impugned order was overturned, and the appellants were granted relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>