<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (5) TMI 114 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84200</link>
    <description>Rule 57G(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was applied to treat endorsed gate passes as valid duty-paying documents for Modvat credit, provided the duty-paid character and bona fides of the documents could be verified. The Tribunal followed an earlier identical reference decision and held that further transfer by endorsement did not by itself destroy the documents&#039; validity. The proposed questions were treated as academic, and the contention that relief had been granted without authority was rejected because the relief remained within the statute and rules. No referable question of law was found, so the Revenue&#039;s reference application was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 13:04:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121344" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (5) TMI 114 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84200</link>
      <description>Rule 57G(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was applied to treat endorsed gate passes as valid duty-paying documents for Modvat credit, provided the duty-paid character and bona fides of the documents could be verified. The Tribunal followed an earlier identical reference decision and held that further transfer by endorsement did not by itself destroy the documents&#039; validity. The proposed questions were treated as academic, and the contention that relief had been granted without authority was rejected because the relief remained within the statute and rules. No referable question of law was found, so the Revenue&#039;s reference application was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>