<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (4) TMI 144 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84159</link>
    <description>Footwear manufacturing could qualify for exemption under Notification No. 88/77-Central Excises where either the worker-based condition or the power-based condition was satisfied. The unit produced evidence, including a State Electricity Board certificate, showing that the power installed and used did not exceed the prescribed limit. A 1/2 H.P. pasting machine located in the factory belonged to an independent contractor and was not shown to be exclusively used by the unit for its own manufacture, so it could not be treated as the assessee&#039;s power use for denying relief. On those facts, the statutory conditions for exemption were met.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 10:58:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (4) TMI 144 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84159</link>
      <description>Footwear manufacturing could qualify for exemption under Notification No. 88/77-Central Excises where either the worker-based condition or the power-based condition was satisfied. The unit produced evidence, including a State Electricity Board certificate, showing that the power installed and used did not exceed the prescribed limit. A 1/2 H.P. pasting machine located in the factory belonged to an independent contractor and was not shown to be exclusively used by the unit for its own manufacture, so it could not be treated as the assessee&#039;s power use for denying relief. On those facts, the statutory conditions for exemption were met.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84159</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>