<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (3) TMI 227 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84138</link>
    <description>Modvat credit was held admissible on polishing bricks used to manufacture polished granite because the final product could not be made without them and they directly produced the polish on the granite, so they were treated as necessary inputs outside the exclusion in Explanation (i) to Rule 57A. Credit was disallowed on circular saw blades, saw blade segments, diamond ring blades, diamond arc blades, levelling segments and milling cutters because they were treated as tools, machinery-related items, or parts of machinery falling within the excluded category. The appeal therefore resulted in credit being allowed only for polishing bricks and denied for the remaining six items.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 10:16:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121282" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (3) TMI 227 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84138</link>
      <description>Modvat credit was held admissible on polishing bricks used to manufacture polished granite because the final product could not be made without them and they directly produced the polish on the granite, so they were treated as necessary inputs outside the exclusion in Explanation (i) to Rule 57A. Credit was disallowed on circular saw blades, saw blade segments, diamond ring blades, diamond arc blades, levelling segments and milling cutters because they were treated as tools, machinery-related items, or parts of machinery falling within the excluded category. The appeal therefore resulted in credit being allowed only for polishing bricks and denied for the remaining six items.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>