<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 212 - ALLAHABAD  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84137</link>
    <description>The High Court disposed of the clarification application after stating that the earlier order contained no confusion. It directed that the Tribunal reconsider the waiver or stay application afresh, while keeping the Court&#039;s observation in mind. The operative effect was that no clarification was granted on the earlier order, and the matter was returned to the Tribunal for fresh consideration of the waiver or stay request.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 18:47:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121281" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 212 - ALLAHABAD  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84137</link>
      <description>The High Court disposed of the clarification application after stating that the earlier order contained no confusion. It directed that the Tribunal reconsider the waiver or stay application afresh, while keeping the Court&#039;s observation in mind. The operative effect was that no clarification was granted on the earlier order, and the matter was returned to the Tribunal for fresh consideration of the waiver or stay request.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>