<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 205 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84113</link>
    <description>Micrometers were treated as precision measuring instruments under the erstwhile Central Excise Tariff, because their true character was that of tools for making precise measurements rather than instruments for mathematical operations. The opinion of a management consultant and the Brussels Trade Nomenclature notes were held to offer no assistance in construing the exemption notification. Although the view that micrometers were merely measuring tools was found erroneous, they were still classified as precision measuring instruments and not as mathematical instruments. They were therefore classifiable under Item 68, but did not qualify for exemption under Notification No. 55/75-C.E. dated 1-3-1975.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:39:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 205 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84113</link>
      <description>Micrometers were treated as precision measuring instruments under the erstwhile Central Excise Tariff, because their true character was that of tools for making precise measurements rather than instruments for mathematical operations. The opinion of a management consultant and the Brussels Trade Nomenclature notes were held to offer no assistance in construing the exemption notification. Although the view that micrometers were merely measuring tools was found erroneous, they were still classified as precision measuring instruments and not as mathematical instruments. They were therefore classifiable under Item 68, but did not qualify for exemption under Notification No. 55/75-C.E. dated 1-3-1975.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84113</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>