<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 192 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84099</link>
    <description>Imported goods brought in consumer packing and fit for immediate use were liable to confiscation, because that form of import brought them within the category justifying seizure on merits. However, the importer&#039;s bona fide explanation that the goods were intended for research and development was accepted as a mitigating factor. On that basis, the penalty was remitted and the redemption fine was reduced, while confiscation itself was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:04:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121243" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 192 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84099</link>
      <description>Imported goods brought in consumer packing and fit for immediate use were liable to confiscation, because that form of import brought them within the category justifying seizure on merits. However, the importer&#039;s bona fide explanation that the goods were intended for research and development was accepted as a mitigating factor. On that basis, the penalty was remitted and the redemption fine was reduced, while confiscation itself was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84099</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>