https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84061 An open-court pronouncement fixing the next hearing date in the presence of the appellant's advocate was treated as valid notice of hearing. The appellant's later letter both claimed non-receipt of notice and sought adjournment, creating a self-contradiction that undermined the plea of lack of notice. As no one appeared for the appellant when the matter was called, the Tribunal held the appeal to be in default and found that it had not been prosecuted. The appeal was dismissed for default in appearance and want of prosecution. en-us Tue, 20 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:44:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84061 An open-court pronouncement fixing the next hearing date in the presence of the appellant's advocate was treated as valid notice of hearing. The appellant's later letter both claimed non-receipt of notice and sought adjournment, creating a self-contradiction that undermined the plea of lack of notice. As no one appeared for the appellant when the matter was called, the Tribunal held the appeal to be in default and found that it had not been prosecuted. The appeal was dismissed for default in appearance and want of prosecution. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 20 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84061