<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (3) TMI 204 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84040</link>
    <description>Agglomerated marble blocks and tiles manufactured from crushed marble mixed with cement, resin and other additives were held to be articles of Heading 68.07, not marble under Heading 25.04, because they were not mineral products in the form of marble. For exemption under Notification No. 59/90, the decisive question was whether the goods were commercially known as mosaic tiles. The evidence, including affidavits, invoices and the assessee&#039;s literature, did not establish that market recognition. Commercial understanding was treated as controlling over dictionary meaning, and the claimed exemption was therefore unavailable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:35:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121184" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (3) TMI 204 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84040</link>
      <description>Agglomerated marble blocks and tiles manufactured from crushed marble mixed with cement, resin and other additives were held to be articles of Heading 68.07, not marble under Heading 25.04, because they were not mineral products in the form of marble. For exemption under Notification No. 59/90, the decisive question was whether the goods were commercially known as mosaic tiles. The evidence, including affidavits, invoices and the assessee&#039;s literature, did not establish that market recognition. Commercial understanding was treated as controlling over dictionary meaning, and the claimed exemption was therefore unavailable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>