https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84025 The Tribunal's decision was challenged on various grounds including procedural irregularities, lack of adherence to natural justice principles, and insufficiency of evidence. The Reference Application highlighted concerns about inconsistent views on identical issues, failure to follow natural justice principles, and errors in establishing clandestine manufacture. The applicant contested the Tribunal's decision based on undisclosed material and insufficient corroborative evidence, emphasizing discrepancies between findings and actual facts. Overall, the case underscores the importance of procedural fairness and evidentiary support in adjudication processes under the Central Excises & Salt Act, 1944. en-us Fri, 24 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:00:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84025 The Tribunal's decision was challenged on various grounds including procedural irregularities, lack of adherence to natural justice principles, and insufficiency of evidence. The Reference Application highlighted concerns about inconsistent views on identical issues, failure to follow natural justice principles, and errors in establishing clandestine manufacture. The applicant contested the Tribunal's decision based on undisclosed material and insufficient corroborative evidence, emphasizing discrepancies between findings and actual facts. Overall, the case underscores the importance of procedural fairness and evidentiary support in adjudication processes under the Central Excises & Salt Act, 1944. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 24 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84025