https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84021 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in both appeals (C/Appeal No. 2979/86 and 2980/86) concerning the alleged import of synthetic waste instead of wool waste. The Department failed to conclusively prove the nature of the imported goods as not wool waste, leading to the Tribunal setting aside the confiscation and penalty. The Tribunal highlighted discrepancies in test reports, denied requests for fresh samples, and emphasized the need for retesting to establish the true nature of the goods. en-us Wed, 22 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:53:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84021 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in both appeals (C/Appeal No. 2979/86 and 2980/86) concerning the alleged import of synthetic waste instead of wool waste. The Department failed to conclusively prove the nature of the imported goods as not wool waste, leading to the Tribunal setting aside the confiscation and penalty. The Tribunal highlighted discrepancies in test reports, denied requests for fresh samples, and emphasized the need for retesting to establish the true nature of the goods. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 22 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84021