https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84020 The appellant contested the denial of exemption and concessional duty for 'Water for injection' under Notification No. 245/83 and 45/82. The Collector allowed the benefit under Notification No. 45/82, correcting the misquoted notifications. The Tribunal remanded the matter for classification reconsideration, ultimately classifying the product as a 'medicament' under Tariff Item 68 or Heading 3003.20. The Vice President resolved the classification and notification issues, concluding that the revenue appeal became irrelevant, resulting in no outstanding demand. The appellant's appeal was accepted, and the department's appeal was rejected, providing a comprehensive resolution. en-us Wed, 22 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:52:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84020 The appellant contested the denial of exemption and concessional duty for 'Water for injection' under Notification No. 245/83 and 45/82. The Collector allowed the benefit under Notification No. 45/82, correcting the misquoted notifications. The Tribunal remanded the matter for classification reconsideration, ultimately classifying the product as a 'medicament' under Tariff Item 68 or Heading 3003.20. The Vice President resolved the classification and notification issues, concluding that the revenue appeal became irrelevant, resulting in no outstanding demand. The appellant's appeal was accepted, and the department's appeal was rejected, providing a comprehensive resolution. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 22 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84020