<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 177 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84014</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the service of notice by affixture was invalid as it did not comply with the requirements of Section 153 of the Customs Act, 1962. As the service was deemed to have occurred on 7th June 1994, the appeals filed on 22nd August 1994 were within the limitation period. The applications for condonation of delay were therefore considered infructuous and disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:38:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 177 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84014</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the service of notice by affixture was invalid as it did not comply with the requirements of Section 153 of the Customs Act, 1962. As the service was deemed to have occurred on 7th June 1994, the appeals filed on 22nd August 1994 were within the limitation period. The applications for condonation of delay were therefore considered infructuous and disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84014</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>