<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (1) TMI 184 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84000</link>
    <description>Waiver of pre-deposit of penalty was allowed where the petitioner filed a sworn affidavit showing no business income, no taxable returns, no immovable property and no bank balance, and the Department produced no material to rebut those assertions. The Tribunal held that, on these facts, insisting on pre-deposit would cause undue hardship and would make the appeal right illusory. A cited precedent was found distinguishable, and relief was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:03:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (1) TMI 184 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84000</link>
      <description>Waiver of pre-deposit of penalty was allowed where the petitioner filed a sworn affidavit showing no business income, no taxable returns, no immovable property and no bank balance, and the Department produced no material to rebut those assertions. The Tribunal held that, on these facts, insisting on pre-deposit would cause undue hardship and would make the appeal right illusory. A cited precedent was found distinguishable, and relief was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>