<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (1) TMI 164 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83980</link>
    <description>Special excise duty was treated as part of the excise burden relevant to computing the discount from maximum retail price under the price-list valuation notification, and the point was considered arguable in favour of the assessee for interim relief. The demand was treated as time-barred because the price lists disclosed the valuation basis and the record did not support suppression or wilful misstatement; the extended period was therefore not available. On that footing, stay and waiver of recovery were granted as the merits were arguable and limitation favoured the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:03:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121124" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (1) TMI 164 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83980</link>
      <description>Special excise duty was treated as part of the excise burden relevant to computing the discount from maximum retail price under the price-list valuation notification, and the point was considered arguable in favour of the assessee for interim relief. The demand was treated as time-barred because the price lists disclosed the valuation basis and the record did not support suppression or wilful misstatement; the extended period was therefore not available. On that footing, stay and waiver of recovery were granted as the merits were arguable and limitation favoured the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83980</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>